Post by shaxper on Sept 23, 2002 0:06:15 GMT -5
Anyone feel like playing guidance counselor?
Here I am, out in the real world, confronted with the fact that I need to choose a career objective for myself sometime sooner rather than later, and I'm very confused. Here are my three options, as I see them. Any random input or virtual slaps across the face would be very much appreciated:
1. High School English Teacher. I've always wanted to teach literature, and this is the place where it counts most, turning kids on before so many of the bad english teachers of the world turn them away from literature forever. There's good money and tenure involved, the area I live in has a high demand for them right now, and all I need is a teaching certificate that I could complete in half a year with a minimum of expense. The problem is that I'd be teaching a lot of kids who don't want to learn. I'm afraid I'd spend more time being a disciplinarian and asserting authority than I would spend actually teaching, and I am not good with confrontation (which the kids should sniff out immediately). I'd also have to deal with Super Intendants, School boards, and a lot of other burocratic nonsense dictated by people with less of an education than I'd have.
2. College English Professor. Nearly everyone I'd teach would genuinely want to learn, discussions would be far more complex and fascinating so that I'd actually learn a few things while I taught, and my authority would never come into question. There's also less ignorant burocracy in most cases. However, we're talking at least four years of graduate school, moving out of the really nice area I just moved to (I love it here) to pursue such a degree, and a far more competitive job market so that there's a reasonable chance I could find myself with an incomprehensibly expensive degree and no job. It would also be hard to coordinate careers with my wife, since college openings could take me ANYWHERE in the country, rather than anywhere in the city limits.
3. Librarian. It almost doesn't seem to belong on the list compared to the other two, but it interests me. I already have five years' experience working part time in libraries, and I really do love the work. Far easier, less competitive, not profit driven, no work or stress to take home with you, and you're still spreading the love of literature with people who want to read. Pursuing an MLS (master of library sciences) would be far cheaper and easier than a PhD, and finding a job should be easier. The pay would not be as nice as with the other two, but I could live off of it and have a seemingly far less stressful life. The main drawback is that I'd have a boss, and while I don't mind the idea of having a boss in general, the fact that twenty years into a job, my nice boss could get replaced by a jerk really bothers me. A library job is only as good as the people who work above you.
There you have it. I'm lost. What do I do? Someone choose for me
Here I am, out in the real world, confronted with the fact that I need to choose a career objective for myself sometime sooner rather than later, and I'm very confused. Here are my three options, as I see them. Any random input or virtual slaps across the face would be very much appreciated:
1. High School English Teacher. I've always wanted to teach literature, and this is the place where it counts most, turning kids on before so many of the bad english teachers of the world turn them away from literature forever. There's good money and tenure involved, the area I live in has a high demand for them right now, and all I need is a teaching certificate that I could complete in half a year with a minimum of expense. The problem is that I'd be teaching a lot of kids who don't want to learn. I'm afraid I'd spend more time being a disciplinarian and asserting authority than I would spend actually teaching, and I am not good with confrontation (which the kids should sniff out immediately). I'd also have to deal with Super Intendants, School boards, and a lot of other burocratic nonsense dictated by people with less of an education than I'd have.
2. College English Professor. Nearly everyone I'd teach would genuinely want to learn, discussions would be far more complex and fascinating so that I'd actually learn a few things while I taught, and my authority would never come into question. There's also less ignorant burocracy in most cases. However, we're talking at least four years of graduate school, moving out of the really nice area I just moved to (I love it here) to pursue such a degree, and a far more competitive job market so that there's a reasonable chance I could find myself with an incomprehensibly expensive degree and no job. It would also be hard to coordinate careers with my wife, since college openings could take me ANYWHERE in the country, rather than anywhere in the city limits.
3. Librarian. It almost doesn't seem to belong on the list compared to the other two, but it interests me. I already have five years' experience working part time in libraries, and I really do love the work. Far easier, less competitive, not profit driven, no work or stress to take home with you, and you're still spreading the love of literature with people who want to read. Pursuing an MLS (master of library sciences) would be far cheaper and easier than a PhD, and finding a job should be easier. The pay would not be as nice as with the other two, but I could live off of it and have a seemingly far less stressful life. The main drawback is that I'd have a boss, and while I don't mind the idea of having a boss in general, the fact that twenty years into a job, my nice boss could get replaced by a jerk really bothers me. A library job is only as good as the people who work above you.
There you have it. I'm lost. What do I do? Someone choose for me